![]() So, Zelda was the first game they developed where the cost was greater? Then you have publishers like Sega saying they’re keeping an eye on the market to see if they can raise just their AAA games to $70. next-gen development thing, but then you have a heavily Last-gen system picking and choosing one of its most popular games to be $70 while everything else is $60. I remember seeing the last-gen version of the same game $60. You just demand.ĭon't take any of this personally, I am not talking about you I want to give you an example of how it looks from a developer/publisher perspective when people silo themselves off into polar arguments.Ĭan you show me? I only ask because I see one game cost $70 for console and the same game cost $60 on PC. You are basically saying that you DO NOT support the industry and you DO NOT support developers. Imagine you live in a world where the cost of living and inflation rise but you are not allowed to make any more money than 10 years ago because some fanboys don't understand that your costs have increased like theirs. Can we take a moment and thank WB for paying for the higher capacity cards. Its not greed and its not a next gen tax. Game costs went up because the cost to make them has increased. So just naturally, you would expect costs to go up. ![]() And on top of that they are using the higher capacity cards for Zelda and now Mortal Kombat which along with the Witcher 3 only makes those three titles as far as I know of. Their costs have gone up just as much as everyone else's. In the meantime, click through for more pics.I disagree with the idea that Nintendo can't charge $70 for their games. We'll be publishing a full review of the system once we've had a chance to fully audition it, in an X Factor-style panel format where various members of the team are rude about its dress sense and ability to remember the words to famous songs. Still, you're not going to be doing much detailed configuration with it, so we're guessing most people will manage.Įxpect to pay around £250 for the HW-C450 when it goes on sale at the end of this month. ![]() This is fine for those with delicate hands, but we're all rather ape-like around here, and prefer slightly larger controllers. On the plus side, the speaker can decode Dolby Digital, which means the sound from your DVDs will be presented clearly and with minimal quality drop.Īs Samsung seems to be making a theme out of small here, the remote control is also pretty dinky. You only get two optical digital connectors and a single 3.5mm auxiliary input, designed to accept audio from an MP3 player. Like most 2.1 systems, inputs are limited. The sub is wireless too, which means you can tuck it away somewhere, as long as it's near a mains socket. It also comes with a small, but powered, subwoofer to handle the bass aspects of the audio spectrum. The system is made up of two parts, the main speaker bar, which contains six tweeters for high and mid-range sounds. The width is considerably greater at 950mm, which is why they call it a bar. The Samsung HW-C450 sits firmly in the small category, with the main speaker unit measuring just 43mm in height. Sound bars come in all sorts of sizes, but all have one goal: to make your TV sound less miserable. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |